New York City Sets Precedent for Energy TransparencyPublished: Sep 10, 2012 Policy | Press Release
City is first in U.S. to disclose private-sector building energy data from a mandatory benchmarking policy
Washington, DC – September 10, 2012 – Marking the beginning of a new era of transparency around energy use in buildings, New York City has publicly posted its 2011 energy benchmarking results for 2,065 large commercial properties, which together cover more than 530 million square feet.
This is the first time that any U.S. city, state, or county has disclosed private-sector building energy data from a mandatory benchmarking policy.
"New York has just taken a giant leap for transparency: this is the largest publication ever of metered energy performance data from buildings in a single city,” said IMT’s executive director, Cliff Majersik. “Markets need information to function, and this will let New Yorkers know how much energy the buildings around them are using. It will allow them to get crucial real-estate information that hasn't been available until now," Majersik said.
The 2011 results are posted on the Greener, Greater Buildings Plan website, along with a letter giving a more detailed explanation of the output scores. The posting of benchmarking results will now be an annual occurrence for all large buildings in New York City. Results for large residential buildings will be posted for the first time in the fall of 2013, along with those for commercial and municipal buildings.
Energy use in buildings is responsible for roughly 75 percent of New York City’s emissions. The benchmarking, or measuring, and disclosure of energy use in buildings is the cornerstone of the city’s Greener, Greater Buildings Plan -- the most comprehensive policy in the nation addressing energy use in existing buildings -- and it is key to achieving the ambitious PlaNYC goal of reducing citywide carbon emissions 30 percent by 2030.
“Mayor Bloomberg and the City Council concluded that mandatory disclosure to the City and public dissemination of the results would be the most effective and transparent route to instilling energy efficiency in the buildings sector, “ said David Bragdon, the director of the NYC Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability. “IMT's emphasis on data and facts is an important contributor to making that case."
The benchmarking data can be used to assess where cost-effective building improvements can be made and to allow the market to find those opportunities. And since New York City’s benchmarking requirement is annual, the city and the market will be able to reward buildings that improve their performance year on year.
The benchmarking data also enabled the City to analyze for the first time how building energy use varies with building age, location, size, fuel mix, and an assortment of other factors.
Benchmarking data from 2010, released last month, showed that energy-use intensity varies dramatically among the same types of buildings, with the worst-performing buildings using three to five times the amount of energy per square foot as the best. Consequently, there is potential to save tremendous amounts of energy by improving the efficiency of the poor performers.
Under New York’s benchmarking ordinance, building owners annually enter energy and water use data and other pertinent information about their buildings, such as square footage and hours of operation, into the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) free online benchmarking tool, ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager.
From this information, Portfolio Manager calculates the benchmarking results, including the energy and water use per square foot, the carbon emissions, and for some types of buildings, a 1-to-100 ENERGY STAR rating comparing the building’s relative energy performance with other similar buildings, normalized for building occupancy factors. The city’s posting includes these outputs.
However, even if all the input data were correct, the benchmarking results still require interpretation. There are many reasons why a building might have a high energy intensity. Sometimes that could be due to inefficient operations or outmoded equipment, but it also could be due to a high occupant density or longer hours of operation. High energy intensity does not always mean energy waste.
ABOUT IMT: The Institute for Market Transformation (IMT) is a Washington, DC-based nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting energy efficiency, green building, and environmental protection in the United States and abroad. Much of IMT's work addresses market failures that inhibit investment in energy efficiency. For more information, visit imt.org.